Government Regulation of the Internet Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Government Regulation of the Internet - Essay ExampleSince the profitss geopolitical demarcation is virtually erased, the question whether a government should step on the internet became in itself questionable. Given that with the issues spawned by the cyberspace are disturbing, that it now becomes an imperative to maintain an acceptable standard of manner over the internet, it is questionable whether the government do it and will it bring good or disaster?This brings to consciousness the geographic relativity of constabularys. Laws are non uniform and essentially differ in each estate while the nature of internet stays the same whichever commonwealth it whitethorn be. For example, laws governing e-commerce and speech in the unify States may differ or may not even exist say that of the core due east country and vice versa that the enforcement of cyberspace rule may prove to be a argufy if not impossible to implement. Speaking against the government may be a crime in the philia easterly and other countries just now is perfectly acceptable in the United States as guaranteed by the source Amendment of the Constitution. E-commerce and the Anti-Piracy law may be stringent in countries such as the United States but may to a fault be non-existent in other countries. Such, many concerned parties proposed to adopt an intergovernmental regulation to create a cross-border harmonization of internet governance policy for greater efficacy. This may appear good on idea but quite impossible to apply. As mentioned above, what can be acceptable in one country may not be acceptable in other countries.... For example, laws governing e-commerce and speech in the United States may differ or may not even exist say that of the Middle East country and vice versa that the enforcement of cyberspace regulation may prove to be a challenge if not impossible to implement. Speaking against the government may be a crime in the Middle East and other countries but is perfectly acceptable in the United States as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution. E-commerce and Anti-Piracy law may be stringent in countries such as United States but may also be non-existent in other countries. Such, many concerned parties proposed to adopt an intergovernmental regulation to create a cross-border harmonization of internet governance policy for greater efficacy. This may appear good on paper but quite impossible to apply. As mentioned above, what can be acceptable in one country may not be acceptable in other countries. Asserting ones law on another sovereignty country is just out of the question to regulate the internet. It will just lucubrate the issue more. There is however other interest groups that espouse the idea of self-imposed regulation of cyberspace conduct. Among these is the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) in the United States whose mandate is to develop a bottom-up consensus on the usage of the internet among the private sector. Though it differed in identity compared to that of the government, it still called for the regulation of the cyberspace by a broader consensus of different interested parties in the private sector. It is not coercive and is through by an initiative of the private sector who acknowledges that there has to be a set of acceptable conduct in the cyberspace to curb if not eliminate misconduct. For